Table 5.
Statistical comparison of morphological integration patterns
| CB | CV | FACE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Younger unaffected → older unaffected | |||
| CB | 0 | ||
| CV | 6 (12.2) | 1 (4.8) | |
| FACE | 9 (16.1) | 10 (17.9) | 7 (25.0) |
| Younger unaffected → pre-op UCLP | |||
| CB | 1 (4.8) | ||
| CV | 6 (12.2) | 7 (33.3) | |
| FACE | 5 (8.9) | 10 (17.9) | 10 (35.7) |
| Pre-op UCLP → post-op UCLP | |||
| CB | 0 | ||
| CV | 2 (4.1) | 0 | |
| FACE | 3 (5.4) | 1 (1.8) | 1 (3.6) |
| Younger unaffected → pre-op ISS | |||
| CB | 0 | ||
| CV | 2 (4.1) | 4 (19.0) | |
| FACE | 6 (10.7) | 14 (25.0) | 4 (14.3) |
| Pre-op ISS → post-op ISS | |||
| CB | 5 (23.8) | ||
| CV | NA | NA | |
| FACE | NA | NA | NA |
CB, cranial base; CV, cranial vault; FACE, facial skeleton; UCLP, unilateral cleft lip and palate; ISS, isolated sagittal craniosynostosis.
For each comparison, cells of the matrix contain the number of linear distance pairs with significantly different levels of morphological integration (given as a percentage in parentheses).