Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: Rev Educ Res. 2009 Mar 1;79(1):262–300. doi: 10.3102/0034654308325998

TABLE 1.

Intervention characteristics

Study Study design Number of participants Grade Duration Person implementing Type of intervention
1. Abbott & Berninger (1999); random assignment; treatment fidelity: yes Treatment-comparison (multiple treatments) 20 (struggling readers) 4th–7th 16 (1/week; 60 mina) Researcher Word study
2. Alfassi (1998); quasiexperimental; treatment fidelity: NR Treatment-comparison 75 (struggling readers) 9th 20 sessions (daily × 4 weeks; 45 min) Teacher Comprehension
3. Allinder, Dunse, Brunken, & Obermiller-Krolikowski (2001); random assignment; treatment fidelity: yes Treatment-comparison (multiple treatments) 49 (LD and struggling readers) 7th 30 sessions (3/week) Teacher Fluency
4. Anderson, Chan, & Henne (1995); random assignment; treatment fidelity: NR Treatment-comparison 17 (struggling readers) 6th 70 sessions (daily × 14 weeks; 120 min) Researcher Comprehension
5. Bhat, Griffin, & Sindelar (2003) Treatment-comparison 40 (LD) 6th–8th 18 sessions (3 days/week, 2 sessions/day) Teacher Word study
6. Bhattacharya & Ehri (2004); random assignment; treatment fidelity: NR Treatment-comparison 60 (struggling readers) 6th–9th 4 sessions (daily 4 days; 30 min) Researcher Word study
7. Chan (1996); random assignment; treatment fidelity: NR Treatment-comparison (multiple treatments) 40 (struggling readers) 7th 9 sessions (across 3 weeks; 60 min) Researcher Comprehension
8. DiCecco & Gleason (2002); random assignment; treatment fidelity: yes Treatment-comparison (multiple treatments) 24 (LD) 6th–8th 20 sessions (daily 4 weeks; 40 min) Researcher and teacher Comprehension
9. L. S. Fuchs, Fuchs, & Kazdan (1999); quasiexperi-mental; treatment fidelity: yes Treatment-comparison 102 (LD, struggling readers, MMR) 9th 40 sessions (5 every 2 weeks) Teacher Multicomponent (comprehension and fluency)
10. Hasselbring & Goin (2004); NR; treatment fidelity: NR Treatment-comparison 125 (RD and struggling readers) 6th–8th NR (daily; 30 min) NR Multicomponent (comprehension, word study)
11. Jitendra, Hoppes, & Xin (2000); random assignment; treatment fidelity: yes Treatment-comparison 33 (LD and struggling readers) 6th–8th 15 sessions (daily 15 days; 30–40 min) Researcher Comprehension
12. Klingner & Vaughn (1996); random assignment; treatment fidelity: NR Treatment-comparison (multiple treatments) 26 (LD, ESL) 7th–8th 27 sessions (daily; 35–40 min) Researcher Comprehension
13. Mastropieri et al. (2001); quasi-experimental; treatment fidelity: yes Treatment-comparison 24 (LD and MR) 7th 25 sessions Teacher Multicomponent (comprehension and fluency)
14. Moore & Scevak (1995); random assignment; treatment fidelity: NR Treatment-comparison 21 (struggling readers) NR (high school) NR (7 weeks) Teacher Comprehension
15. Penney (2002); quasi-experimental; treatment fidelity: yes Treatment-comparison 33 (struggling readers) NR (17-year-olds) 18 sessions (56 min) Teacher Word study
16. Wilder & Williams (2001); quasi-experimental; treatment fidelity: yes Treatment-comparison (multiple treatments) 91 (LD) 6th–8th NR (3/week; 45 min) Teacher Comprehension
17. Williams, Brown, Silverstein, & deCani (1994); random assignment; treatment fidelity: yes Treatment-comparison (multiple treatments) 93 (LD) 7th–8th NR (4 weeks; 40 min) Teacher Comprehension
18. Bryant et al. (2000); treatment fidelity: yes Single group 14 (RD) 6th NR (4 months; 90 min) Teacher Multicomponent (word identification, fluency, comprehension)
19. MacArthur & Haynes (1995); treatment fidelity: NR Single group 10 (LD) 9th–10th 2 sessions Researchers Comprehension
20. Mercer, Campbell, Miller, Mercer, & Lane (2000); treatment fidelity: NR Single group 49 (LD) 6th–8th NR (daily; 5–6 min) Teacher Fluency
21. Daly & Martens (1994); treatment fidelity: yes Single subject 2 (LD) NR (11.11 yr.) 21 (1–2/day) Teacher and researchers Fluency
22. Freeland, Skinner, Jackson, McDaniel, & Smith (2000); treatment fidelity: yes Single subject 3 (LD) 7th–8th, 11th NR (daily) Researcher Fluency
23. Gardhill & Jitendra (1999); treatment fidelity: yes Single subject 6 (LD) 6th and 8th NR (14–20 weeks; 40–50 min) NR Comprehension
24. Lauterbach & Bender (1995); treatment fidelity: NR Single subject 3 (LD, MMR) 9th NR Teacher Comprehension
25. Scott & Shearer-Lingo (2002); treatment fidelity: yes Single subject 3 (RD, EBD) 7th NR Researcher Multicomponent (word study and fluency)
26. Steventon & Frederick (2003); treatment fidelity: yes Single subject 1 (struggling reader) NR (15-year-old) 26 sessions Teacher Multicomponent (word study, fluency)
27. Strong, Wehby, Falk, & Lane (2004); treatment fidelity: yes Single subject 6 (RD) 7th–8th NR (10–15 min/session, per program) Researcher Multicomponent (word study, fluency)
28. Vallecorsa & deBettencourt (1997); treatment fidelity: NR Single subject 3 (LD) 7th 6 sessions (30 min) Teacher Comprehension
29. Valleley & Shriver (2003); treatment fidelity: yes Single subject 4 (LD) 9th–10th 30 sessions (3/week for 10 weeks; 20 min) Researcher Fluency

Note. NR = not reported; LD = learning disability; MMR = mild mental retardation; MR = mental retardation; RD = reading disability; ESL = English as a Second Language; EBD = emotional or behavioral disability.

a

Indicates the number of minutes per session.