Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Imaging Behav. 2009 Mar 1;3(1):24–37. doi: 10.1007/s11682-008-9047-y

Table 2.

Experiment II: A 2×2 ANOVA (opponent type by mentalization) of the response to outcome interval BOLD signal in ROIs identified in experiment I

1. Anatomic location 2. Talairach coordinates 3. Mentalization S>NS 4. Opponent type H>C 5. Human S>NS 6. Computer S>NS





x y z F(1,17) p F(1,17) p t(17) p t(17) P
R TPJa 53 −61 6 58.4 .0001 7.7 .01 7.3 .0001 6.0 .0001
L TPJ −45 −60 14 35.3 .0001 8.0 .01 5.8 .0001 4.9 .0001
−62 −55 5 18.7 .0001 10.4 .005 3.2 .005 4.2 .001
R TPa 27 8 −21 15.0 .001 6.6 .02 3.8 .002 2.3 .03
L TP −29 11 −21 19.6 .0001 5.2 .03 3.8 .001 3.1 .006
−21 5 −20 7.1 .01 9.1 .008 2.4 0.03 1.8 n.s
R FGa 36 −49 16 14.0 .002 6.3 .02 5.7 .0001 2.2 .04
MPFC −9 47 14 11.1 .004 5.7 .03 3.3 .004 2.3 .04
−6 47 6 15.4 .001 7.6 .01 2.4 .03 2.7 .01
R VLPFCa 48 7 27 23.9 .0001 0.2 n.s 5.0 .0001 3.6 .002

Main effects are reported in columns 3–4 and planned contrasts in columns 5–6. Coordinates reported are the points of maximal activation of the contrast human show>no-show (column 5, in italics) and/or main effect of opponent type (human>computer, column 4, in italics) within the same clusters of activation. Note that the VLPFC is the only region that did not have a significant main effect of opponent type, indicating no differences in activation between human and computer runs

L left, R right, TPJ temporoparietal junction, TP temporal pole, FG fusiform gyrus, VLPFC ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, MPFC medial prefrontal cortex, ACC anterior cingulate cortex, S ‘show’ opponent's response, NS ‘no-show’ opponent's response, H human-opponent, C computer-opponent

a

Maximal activation in both contrasts overlap