Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Polit Psychol. 2009 Oct 1;30(5):805–828. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00726.x

Table 5.

Unstandardized Coefficients from the Hierarchical Multiple Regression Model Predicting Opposition to Contract Set-Asides (Study 2)

Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Variable b SE b SE b SE
Policy beneficiary −0.14+ 0.07 −0.12+ 0.07 −0.12+ 0.07
Limited government 0.08 0.22 0.11 0.21 0.08 0.21
Liberal-conservative ID 0.31+ 0.18 0.21 0.18 0.28 0.17
Political party preference −0.02 0.19 −0.03 0.18 −0.05 0.18
Anti-egal. (opportunity) −0.12 0.29 −0.22 0.29 −0.25 0.28
Anti-egal. (outcomes) 0.25 0.26 0.18 0.26 0.24 0.25
Symbolic racism -- -- 0.46* 0.20 0.49* 0.20
SR × Policy Beneficiary -- -- -- -- −0.75* 0.36
(Constant) 0.57*** 0.03 0.57*** 0.03 0.56*** 0.03

R2 for model .13 .19* .24*
ΔR2 over previous model -- .06* .05*
+

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

***

p < .001.

Note: The manipulation of policy beneficiary was dummy-coded (viz., 0 = women, 1 = Blacks). Attitude variables were scored such that higher scores entail higher racism, greater opposition to equality and large government, more conservative ideology, and stronger identification with the Republican Party. The adjusted R2 for the final step is .15.