Table 5.
Step 1 |
Step 2 |
Step 3 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | b | SE | b | SE | b | SE |
Policy beneficiary | −0.14+ | 0.07 | −0.12+ | 0.07 | −0.12+ | 0.07 |
Limited government | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.21 |
Liberal-conservative ID | 0.31+ | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.28 | 0.17 |
Political party preference | −0.02 | 0.19 | −0.03 | 0.18 | −0.05 | 0.18 |
Anti-egal. (opportunity) | −0.12 | 0.29 | −0.22 | 0.29 | −0.25 | 0.28 |
Anti-egal. (outcomes) | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.25 |
Symbolic racism | -- | -- | 0.46* | 0.20 | 0.49* | 0.20 |
SR × Policy Beneficiary | -- | -- | -- | -- | −0.75* | 0.36 |
(Constant) | 0.57*** | 0.03 | 0.57*** | 0.03 | 0.56*** | 0.03 |
| ||||||
R2 for model | .13 | .19* | .24* | |||
ΔR2 over previous model | -- | .06* | .05* |
p < .10.
p < .05.
p < .001.
Note: The manipulation of policy beneficiary was dummy-coded (viz., 0 = women, 1 = Blacks). Attitude variables were scored such that higher scores entail higher racism, greater opposition to equality and large government, more conservative ideology, and stronger identification with the Republican Party. The adjusted R2 for the final step is .15.