Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jan;72(1):246–273. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.1.246

Table 9.

Individual Parameter Estimates for the Best-Fitting Models in Experiment 2

P Model
Ter2
Ter3
Ter4
st decay c2 c3 c4 σ
1 A(3T; 1C; eS) 0.269 0.329 0.352 0.138 0 0.723 0.723 0.723 0.496
2 A(3T; 1C; eS) 0.228 0.280 0.306 0.150 0 0.785 0.785 0.785 0.534
3 A(3T; 1C; eS) 0.300 0.335 0.358 0.106 0 0.747 0.747 0.747 0.352

M A(3T; 1C; eS) 0.266 0.315 0.339 0.131 0 0.752 0.752 0.752 0.461

5 A(1T; 1C; eS) 0.285 0.285 0.285 0.178 0 1.246 1.246 1.246 0.235
P
ρn2
ρl2
ρh2
ρn3
ρl3
ρh3
ρn4
ρl4
ρh4
1 A(3T; 1C; eS) .738 .703 .867 .738 .750 .857 .688 .718 .899
2 A(3T; 1C; eS) .730 .839 .850 .767 .778 .938 .774 .794 .968
3 A(3T; 1C; eS) .745 .802 .839 .758 .793 .808 .785 .832 .892

M A(3T; 1C; eS) .738 .781 .852 .754 .774 .868 .749 .781 .920

5 A(1T; 1C; eS) .672 .658 .726 .513 .525 .576 .418 .433 .524

Note. Individual parameter estimates for best-fitting model, according to BIC. Column labels match that of Table 6, except for: ρλn = input strength at the λ level of bias (n = neutral; l = low; h = high) for the corresponding n number of alternatives. P = Participant number; M = Mean for participants 1 through 3.