Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2009 Dec;24(4):890–900. doi: 10.1037/a0017896

Table 2.

Effects of Detached and Positive Reappraisal Instructions on Subjective Target Emotion Experience, Physiological Reactivity, and Facial Expression in Three Age Groups

Detached Reappraisal Positive Reappraisal
20s 40s 60s 20s 40s 60s
Subjective Experience* Watch 4.43 (.42) 5.30 (.41) 5.03 (.40) 4.58 (.40) 5.21 (.39) 5.88 (.42)
Reappraise 3.25 (.45) 4.08 (.43) 5.08 (.43) 4.49 (.42) 5.42 (.41) 5.20 (.44)
Physiological Reactivitya* Watch .01 (.07) .04 (.07) −.10 (.07) .01 (.07) −.02 (.07) .22 (.07)
Reappraise −.13 (.08) −.05 (.08) .02 (.08) .05 (.08) .05 (.07) .06 (.08)
Facial Expressionb Watch .28 (.08) .38 (.08) .30 (.08) .30 (.07) .23 (.07) .33 (.08)
Reappraise .14 (.09) .28 (.09) .21 (.09) .19 (.08) .27 (.08) .32 (.09)

Note. Cell values reflect estimates based upon modified population marginal means; standard errors are in parentheses.

*

The three-way interaction among Instruction (Just Watch vs. Reappraise), Age Group, and Reappraisal Type was significant at p < .05.

a

More negative Physiological Reactivity values indicate smaller increases in arousal from baseline to film clip. Apparent increases from Just Watch trials to Reappraise trials are an artifact of the separate z-scoring for these trials, and reflect smaller decreases in reactivity across trials rather than actual increases.

b

Mean values represent the average intensity of target emotion expression across all 5-second bins of the film clip.