Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 Nov;118(4):797–805. doi: 10.1037/a0017204

Table 2.

Means, Standard Deviations, and Score Ranges for the Minnesota Eating Behavior Survey (MEBS) Scales.

MEBS Scales Biological Siblings (n = 107) Adoptive Siblings (n = 224) Mean Comparisons Levene’s Test
of Variances
M (SD) Range % ≥
cut-off
α M (SD) Range % ≥
cut-off
α t (329) p d F (1, 329) p
Total Score
(Possible score = 0–30)
7.56
(6.17)
0–28 11% .90 7.07
(5.62)
0–24 10% .88 −.73 .47 .08 1.22 .27
Weight Preoccupation
(Possible score = 0–8)
2.95
(2.58)
0–8 12% .84 2.65
(2.37)
0–8 10% .81 .15 .29 .12 2.04 .15
Body Dissatisfaction
(Possible score = 0–6)
2.22
(2.00)
0–6 29% .79 1.83
(1.96)
0–6 24% .82 −.68 .09 .20 .39 .54
Binge Eating
(Possible score = 0–7)
1.40
(1.60)
0–7 18% .71 1.56
(1.55)
0–7 20% .67 .85 .40 .10 .03 .87
Compensatory Behavior
(Possible score = 0–5)
0.31
(0.79)
0–5 8% .67 0.35
(0.75)
0–4 8% .54 .49 .62 .06 .28 .59

Note. MEBS = Minnesota Eating Behavior Survey; % ≥ cut-off = percent of siblings who scored above the clinical cut-offs on the MEBS scales (Cut-offs: Total Score = 15.55; Weight Preoccupation = 6.11; Body Dissatisfaction = 3.95; Binge Eating = 2.53; Compensatory Behaviors = 1.53); d = Cohen’s effect size for mean comparisons. Although log-transformed Binge Eating scores were used in analyses, raw values are listed here for descriptive purposes.