Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 6;192(2):502–517. doi: 10.1128/JB.00803-09

TABLE 4.

Gene fragments identified during RDA and their annotation

Clone Best match (accession no.) Length (nt) % Identitya % Similaritya E value No. of clones obtained
Subspecies distribution (no./total) in Southern analysisb
1st RDA 2nd RDA Cfv Cff
4Ch GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase; Thiomicrospira crunogena XCL-2 (ABB42272.1) 419 65 80 2 × 10−47 5 0 0/10 8/10
3Dv Hypothetical protein pTet_29; Campylobacter jejuni 81-176 (YP_247557.1) 354 42 56 9 × 10−10 0 1 10/10 0/10
3Cp Flagellin B; Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus 82-40 (ZP_01073199.1) 366 70 86 1 × 10−23 4 6 9/10 2/10
1Au TrbE; Agrobacterium tumefaciens (NP_059757.1) 571 40 60 1 × 10−27 3 0 5/10 1/10
1Du TrbJ; Rhizobium sp. NGR234 (NP_443810.1) 544 21 51 1 × 10−06 14 0 5/10 1/10
1Bu DNA gyrase subunit A; Campylobacter jejuni (AAS88433.1) 348 99 99 1 × 10−59 1 0 4/10 0/10
1Ac Conserved hypothetical protein; Campylobacter coli RM2228 (EAL57391.1) 404 58 78 0.025 7 5 2/5 0/7
a

As revealed by BlastX analysis.

b

Cfv, C. fetus subsp. venerealis; Cff, C. fetus subsp. fetus.