Table 2.
Line | LF Class | Haplotype | Derived Mutant Line | LF Class | Haplotype |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vesna | Lf-d | A | XVIII/17 | lf-a | No |
Torsdag | Lf | A | K319 | lf | C |
K2 | lf-a | No | |||
Wt4042 | Lf | A | Wt11796 | lf-a | No |
HL75 | Lf | A | HL76 | lf-a | B |
Porta | Lf | A | Wt11790 | lf | C |
Wt11791 | lf | C | |||
Paloma | Lf | A | Wt11795 | lf-a | E |
WL1771 | Lf-d | D | WL1770 | Lf | D |
WL1769 | lf | D | |||
Champagne | Lf-d | A | |||
Térèse | Lf | A | |||
HL7 | lf-a | No |
Mutants and their progenitor lines are described by Taylor and Murfet (1993). The PsTFL1c sequences were grouped in five haplotypes (A to E) as described in Figure 6. “No” indicates that PsTFL1c could not be amplified by PCR and was not detected on a DNA gel blot (Figure 5). HL7 is a natural mutant; therefore, no progenitor line is available.