Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan;69(1):4–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03537.x

Table 2.

Methods of validation and median percentage of cases confirmed using each method

Validation method n validations carried out Percentage of cases confirmed by validation Median (Range)
Internal
Manual review of computerized records or diagnostic algorithm 31 86.2 (33–100)
Sensitivity analysis 23 n/a
External
Comparison of rates 143 n/a
Additional information from GP 160 88.6 (24–100)
Questionnaire to GP only 43 91.7 (26–93)
Questionnaire and record request to GP 39 90.0 (41–100)
Record request to GP only 78 82.7 (24–100)
Total 357 88.6 (24–100)

It was a requirement for inclusion in our review for each study (with the exception of comparison of rates and sensitivity analyses) to provide a numerical estimate of the proportion of cases confirmed.