Table 2.
Methods of validation and median percentage of cases confirmed using each method
| Validation method | n validations carried out | Percentage of cases confirmed by validation Median (Range) |
|---|---|---|
| Internal | ||
| Manual review of computerized records or diagnostic algorithm | 31 | 86.2 (33–100) |
| Sensitivity analysis | 23 | n/a |
| External | ||
| Comparison of rates | 143 | n/a |
| Additional information from GP | 160 | 88.6 (24–100) |
| Questionnaire to GP only | 43 | 91.7 (26–93) |
| Questionnaire and record request to GP | 39 | 90.0 (41–100) |
| Record request to GP only | 78 | 82.7 (24–100) |
| Total | 357 | 88.6 (24–100) |
It was a requirement for inclusion in our review for each study (with the exception of comparison of rates and sensitivity analyses) to provide a numerical estimate of the proportion of cases confirmed.