Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Dec;29(4):262–267. doi: 10.1080/01674820802546220

Table 4.

Concurrent validity: Correlations between PES, STAI, CES-D, and WHO scores

Visit 1 Visit 2 Visit 3 Visit 4 Visit 5
STAI
CES-D
WHO
STAI
CES-D
WHO
STAI
CES-D
WHO
STAI
CES-D
WHO
STAI
CES-D
WHO
Frequency Hassles 0.27** 0.36 −0.34 0.40 0.38 −0.38 0.40 0.35 −0.35 0.38 0.40 −0.39 0.34 0.39 −0.39
Frequency Uplifts 0.03 −0.06 0.09 −0.16 −0.19 0.16 −0.25* −0.23* 0.27** −0.34 −0.32 0.26** −0.13 −0.11 0.03
Intensity Hassles 0.40 0.44 −0.36 0.54 0.47 −0.51 0.56 0.57 −0.53 0.59 0.66 −0.59 0.44 0.55 −0.58
Intensity Uplifts −0.20* −0.33** 0.29** −0.24* −0.21* 0.27** −0.45 −0.35 0.42 −0.37 −0.29** 0.33 −0.46 −0.30** 0.30**
Frequency Ratio 0.27** 0.37 −0.38 0.53 0.49 −0.48 0.47 0.41 −0.41 0.51 0.49 −0.46 0.39 0.40 −0.37
Intensity Ratio 0.44 0.55 −0.47 0.59 0.54 −0.57 0.65 0.62 −0.59 0.66 0.67 −0.61 0.56 0.54 −0.55

ns

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

all others p < .001.