Table 3.
Logistic Regressions Predicting Sexual Activity by Gender and Race
Sexual Activity | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Logistic Odds Ratios | ||||
Boys (n=470) | Girls (n=514) | African Americans (n=412) | Hispanics (n=470) | |
Adolescent Demographics | ||||
Age(older omitted) | .19*** | .29*** | .22*** | .20*** |
City (Chicago omitted)A | ||||
BostonB | 1.26 | .99 | .83 | 1.41 |
San AntonioC | 1.91* | 1.50 | 1.70 | 2.05* |
Female (males omitted) | .37*** | .65 | ||
Race | ||||
African American (omitted) | ||||
White | .35* | .33* | ||
Hispanic | .49** | .81 | ||
Familial Demographics | ||||
Family Structure | ||||
Stable Single (omitted) | ||||
Stable Two-Parent | 2.55* | 2.53 | 2.30 | 2.81* |
Stable Separated | 1.50 | 3.18*** | 1.60 | 2.36* |
Into Union | 1.11 | 3.17** | 1.86 | 1.36 |
Out of Union | .29 | .84 | .38 | .86 |
Maternal Education | ||||
Less than HS (omitted) | ||||
HS/GED | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.41 | .81 |
Tech or Higher | .44 | .23 | .33* | .84 |
Increased Education | .89 | .46 | .77 | .52 |
HS or greater | ||||
Welfare Status | ||||
Stable off Welfare (omitted) | ||||
Stable on Welfare | 1.56 | 1.19 | 1.34 | 1.26 |
Trans on Welfare | 2.25 | 2.27 | 3.19 | 2.22 |
Trans off Welfare | 1.59 | 1.27 | .91 | 2.74** |
Income | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Family Processes | ||||
Family Routines | .91 | .94 | .96 | .85 |
Father Involvement | .87 | .67* | .91 | .66* |
Mother-Child | 1.58 | .73 | 1.39 | .79 |
Relationship | ||||
Parental Monitoring | .37 | .45 | .31 | .30 |
Father-Child Trust & Communication | .98 | .89 | .82 | 1.09 |
Father Child Anger & Alienation | 1.01 | 1.10 | .87 | 1.14 |
Individual Attributes | ||||
Academic Achievement | .86 | .82 | .81 | .85 |
Academic Aspirations | 1.09 | 1.10 | 1.12 | 1.12 |
Delinquency | 3.15** | 5.21*** | 2.72* | 4.60*** |
LR Chi-Square | 121.92*** | 111.36*** | 106.46*** | 113.69*** |
Pseudo R2 | .21 | .21 | .21 | .22 |
Notes: p < .001;
p < .01;
p < .05.