Table 2.

Models 1 and 2 in Total Sample: Peer Status and Peer Standing as Predictors of Dating Status

Predictor	Variables in Model	Wald χ2	Odds Ratio	Confidence Interval (5th, 95th)
Model 1: Peer Status	Cohort	0.01	0.97	0.59, 1.62
	Race	Wald χ2 (2, 289) = 4.18, ns
	Puberty	4.54*	1.05	1.00, 1.10
	Gender	8.34**	2.33	1.31, 4.14
	Neglected	3.93*	045	0.20, 0.99
	Popular	5.53*	2.61	1.12, 5.80
	Controversial	6.83**	7.78	1.67, 36.27
	Rejected	0.29	1.25	0.56, 2.78
Model 2: Peer Standing	Cohort	0.24	0.88	0.52, 1.48
	Race	Wald χ2 (2, 289) = 0.91, ns
	Puberty	4.39*	1.05	1.00, 1.10
	Gender	3.21	1.95	1.21, 2.69
	Conventional leadership	6.75**	1.51	1.20, 1.82
	Unconventional leadership	8.57**	4.34	3.36, 5.32
	Conventional Leadership × Gender	1.12	–	–
	Unconventional Leadership × Gender	0.05	–	–

Note: Odds ratios and confidence intervals do not apply for the interaction terms. Gender is coded 0 (female) or 1 (male).

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.