Table 2.

Nucleotide sequence divergence comparisons of the 10 representative taxa from those included in phylogenetic analyses

	Lych	Vjon	Stok	Vpos	Vchi	Hlyd	Harb	Vmes	Vamy	Vpop
Lych		0.024	0.108	0.070	0.033	0.065	0.065	0.062	0.062	0.046
Vjon	0.305		0.088	0.041	0.012	0.068	0.068	0.062	0.062	0.034
Stok	0.437	0.369		0.134	0.015	0.143	0.143	0.136	0.137	0.119
Vpos	0.423	0.352	0.527		0.034	0.103	0.103	0.096	0.096	0.080
Vchi	0.311	0.276	0.444	0.351		0.075	0.075	0.072	0.072	0.043
Hlyd	0.548	0.505	0.643	0.524	0.559		0.000*	0.012	0.012	0.046
Harb	0.520	0.496	0.637	0.539	0.558	0.038		0.012	0.012	0.046
Vmes	0.545	0.446	0.646	0.523	0.569	0.217	0.212		0.000	0.040
Vamy	0.516	0.454	0.650	0.520	0.529	0.196	0.207	0.110		0.040
Vpop	0.524	0.516	0.682	0.494	0.520	0.448	0.465	0.431	0.431

Divergence values of the ndhF based on Jukes-Cantor corrected proportion using synonymous differences are above the diagonal. Divergence values of the ITS based on Kimura’s two-parameter model are below the diagonal. Full names of taxa are in Table 1. 

^*This value is 0 because it is based on synonymous substitutions and the two species of Hesperomannia differ by only a single nonsynonymous substitution. If sequence divergence is calculated using all substitutions the value is 0.0013.