Table 4.
N2 fixation and H2 evolution of white lupin plants grown in silica sand with +P or −P nutrient solution
21 DAI |
37 DAI |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
+P | −P | +P | −P | |
N fixed based on 15N2 uptake [nmol N (mg DM nodule)−1 h−1] | 75·7 | 73·6 | 50·2 | 2·34* |
N fixed based on H2 evolution [nmol N (mg DM nodule)−1 h−1] | 58·6 | 65·2 | 40·52 | 3·89* |
H2 evolution [nmol H2 (mg DM nodule)−1 h−1] | ||||
ANA | 61 | 55 | 44 | 15* |
TNA | 149 | 153 | 107 | 21* |
EAC | 0·59 | 0·64* | 0·58 | 0·28* |
EAC based on 15N2 uptake and H2 evolution (ANA) | 0·65 | 0·67 | 0·63 | 0·19* |
N fixed (15N2 uptake) nodule−1 [nmol N nodule−1 h−1] | 50·29 | 34·58* | 83·84 | 2·76* |
N fixed (15N2 uptake) total P−1 [nmol N (mg P in plant)−1 h−1] | 235·9 | 321·1* | 400·4 | 105·34* |
N fixed (15N2 uptake) nodule P−1 [μmol N (total P in nodules)−1 h−1] | 12·26 | 23·23* | 7·58 | 1·85* |
Data are means of six replicates.
ANA, Apparent nitrogenase activity; TNA, total nitrogenase activity; EAC, electron allocation coefficient.
Significantly different from the +P treatment, t-test (P ≤ 0·05).