Skip to main content
. 2006 Oct;98(4):731–740. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl154

Table 4.

N2 fixation and H2 evolution of white lupin plants grown in silica sand with +P or −P nutrient solution

21 DAI
37 DAI
+P −P +P −P
N fixed based on 15N2 uptake [nmol N (mg DM nodule)−1 h−1] 75·7 73·6 50·2 2·34*
N fixed based on H2 evolution [nmol N (mg DM nodule)−1 h−1] 58·6 65·2 40·52 3·89*
H2 evolution [nmol H2 (mg DM nodule)−1 h−1]
    ANA 61 55 44 15*
    TNA 149 153 107 21*
    EAC 0·59 0·64* 0·58 0·28*
EAC based on 15N2 uptake and H2 evolution (ANA) 0·65 0·67 0·63 0·19*
N fixed (15N2 uptake) nodule−1 [nmol N nodule−1 h−1] 50·29 34·58* 83·84 2·76*
N fixed (15N2 uptake) total P−1 [nmol N (mg P in plant)−1 h−1] 235·9 321·1* 400·4 105·34*
N fixed (15N2 uptake) nodule P−1 [μmol N (total P in nodules)−1 h−1] 12·26 23·23* 7·58 1·85*

Data are means of six replicates.

ANA, Apparent nitrogenase activity; TNA, total nitrogenase activity; EAC, electron allocation coefficient.

*

Significantly different from the +P treatment, t-test (P ≤ 0·05).