Table 5.
Factors associated with Anopheline and Culicine detection sensitivity in wet habitats reported by CORPs.
| Anophelines | Culicines | |||||
| Variable | % (n/N) | OR [95%CI] | P | % (n/N) | OR [95%CI] | P |
| Habitat category | NA | NA | 0.331 | NA | NA | 0.421 |
| Natural | 22.2 (6/27) | 1.00 [NA]a | NAa | 76.3 (29/38) | 1.00 [NA]a | NAa |
| Artificial agricultural | 31.3 (5/16) | 2.03 [0.397-10.375] | 0.395 | 63.6 (7/11) | 0.72 [0.220-2.366] | 0.590 |
| Artificial non-agricultural | 33.3(18/54) | 2.34 [0.7607.231] | 0.138 | 71.4(225/315) | 1.39 [0.714-2.688] | 0.336 |
| Intervention status | NA | NA | 0.042 | NA | NA | 0.005 |
| Non-larviciding | 40.0 (16/40) | 1.00 [NA]a | NAa | 80.6 (137/170) | 1.00 [NA]a | NAa |
| larviciding | 22.8 (13/57) | 0.37 [0.142-0.965] | 0.042 | 63.9 (124/194) | 0.35 [0.167-0.722] | 0.005 |
The probability of mosquito larvae detected by the CORPs modelled with a binary distribution and logit link function using Generalised Estimating Equations (GEE) treating intervention status and habitat category as the potential predictors.
a; reference group for particular variable
CI; confidence interval
CORPs; community-owned resource persons
N; the number of habitats that were reported to be wet by CORPs during routine habitat surveys and contained larvae during cross-sectional surveys
n; the number of habitats where CORPs found larvae during their routine habitat survey,
NA; Not applicable