Table 3.
Summary of Findings for comparison two: Comparison of different types of electronic guideline implementation
| Study | Risk of bias | No or patients/professionals | Intervention | Outcomes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Process | Patient | ||||
|
Van Wijk [31] Cluster-RCT |
low | 7,094 patients, 44 primary care practices | Intervention group one: BloodLink Guideline Intervention group two: BloodLink Restricted |
Y | |
| In favour of BloodLink Guideline | |||||
|
Rollman [13] Cluster-RCT |
moderate | 200 patients, 17 primary care physicians | Intervention group one: Guideline-based treatment advice for depression: active care Intervention group two: Guideline-based treatment advice for depression: passive care |
N | N |
|
Van Wyk [32] Cluster-RCT |
moderate | 87,866 patients, 77 primary care physicians | Intervention group one: Clinical decision support system with respect to screening and treatment of dyslipidemia: alerting version Intervention group two: Clinical decision support system with respect to screening and treatment of dyslipidemia: on-demand version |
Y | |
| In favour of the alerting version | |||||
Y = if at least 50% of outcomes significant, N = if less than 50% of outcomes significant