Table 4.
Comparison of Dice similarity coefficients for the lesion segmentation between different methods on different real data sets.
Method | DSC |
---|---|
Lesion-TOADS | 0.63 |
Wu et al. (2006) | 0.70 |
Harmouche et al. (2006) | 0.609 |
Zijdenbos et al. (2002)* | 0.60 |
García-Lorenzo et al. (2008) | 0.55 |
Aït-Ali et al. (2005) | 0.52 |
Leemput et al. (2001) | 0.51 |
This is the average of the reported DSCs computed between the result of this method and seven manual segmentations.