Skip to main content
. 1998 Dec 22;95(26):15464–15468. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15464

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Himalayacetus subathuensis type specimen compared with an earlier Asian mesonychid and a later Asian archaeocete. All are left dentaries shown in medial view. (a) Sinonyx jiashanensis type (6), late Paleocene, with incisor I1–3, canine C1, premolar P1–4, and molar M1–3 (China; Institute of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Palaeoanthropology IVPP 10760). (b) H. subathuensis type, early Eocene, with M2–3 (India; Roorkee University RUSB 2003). (c) Representative middle Eocene archaeocete with P3–4 and M1–3 (Pakistan; Geological Survey of Pakistan–University of Michigan GSP-UM 3062, drawing reversed from right side). Note similarities in overall size and rounded molar profiles, suggesting similar trophic adaptation. H. subathuensis retains a small mandibular canal (mc) like that of earlier mesonychids, contrasting with the larger mandibular canal of Ambulocetus and all postpakicetid archaeocetes; a small mandibular canal precludes whale-like hearing in water (3).