Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov;195(5):433–439. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.057596

Table 3.

Programme determinants of outcomesa

Change in baseline IDEAS scores, n (%)
<20%, no improvement 20-40%, moderate improvement >40%, marked improvement Coefficient P
Duration of service contact,b years
    <2 3 (6.7) 23 (51.1) 19 (42.2) -0.08 0.48
    2-3 2 (6.1) 7 (21.2) 24 (72.7) 0.28 0.02
    ≥3.1
18 (11.4)
65 (41.1)
75 (47.5)
ref.

Medication adherenceb
    Yes 2 (1.2) 61 (36.1) 106 (62.7) 0.77 <0.001
    No
21 (31.8)
34 (51.5)
11 (16.7)
ref.

Status of follow-upb
    Dropped out 18 (46.2) 19 (48.6) 2 (2.7) -0.95 <0.001
    Continued follow-up and planned discharge
5 (2.6)
76 (38.8)
116 (58.7)
ref.

Family engagementc
    Present 7 (3.9) 63 (34.6) 112 (61.5) 0.76 <0.001
    Absent
16 (29.6)
32 (59.3)
6 (11.1)
ref.

Membership in self-help groupsc
    Yes 4 (2.6) 57 (36.8) 94 (60.7) 0.52 <0.001
    No 19 (23.5) 38 (46.9) 24 (29.7) ref.

IDEAS, Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale; ref., reference.

a.

All percentages are row percentages.

b.

n = 235.

c.

n = 236.