Table 2.
Characteristics and treatment of osteolytic lesions
| Patient | Lesion | Lesion type | Fill method | Lesion volume (cm3) | Total | Artifact-free region | Metal artifact region | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fill at surgery | New mineral at followup | Fill at surgery | New mineral at followup | Fill at surgery | New mineral at followup | |||||
| 1 | 1 | Dome | Injection | 30.8 | 17% | 22% | 4% | 14% | 51% | 44% |
| 2 | Dome | Injection | 1.4 | 9% | 21% | 9% | 21% | |||
| 3 | Rim | Not treated | 1.3 | −16% | 14% | −16% | 14% | |||
| 2 | 4 | Rim | Not treated | 0.5 | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 0% |
| 5 | Dome + rim | Injection | 25.2 | 59% | 35% | 91% | 72% | 56% | 32% | |
| 6 | Rim | Not treated | 3 | −24% | 19% | −24% | 19% | |||
| 3 | 7 | Dome | Injection | 14.8 | 34% | 23% | 28% | 20% | 51% | 32% |
| 8 | Dome + rim | Injection | 13.8 | 8% | 24% | 8% | 24% | |||
| 9 | Dome + rim | Injection | 18.2 | 15% | 9% | −2% | 0% | 15% | 9% | |
| 4 | 10 | Dome | Injection | 43.5 | 66% | 28% | 69% | 38% | 64% | 19% |
| 11 | Rim | Not treated | 2.2 | 4% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 38% | 9% | |
| 5 | 12 | Dome | Injection | 3.3 | 58% | 21% | 65% | 23% | 7% | 2% |
| 13 | Dome + rim | Injection | 6.9 | 38% | 11% | 6% | 8% | 50% | 12% | |
| 6 | 14 | Dome + rim | Injection | 4.1 | 62% | 26% | 81% | 46% | 58% | 22% |
| 15 | Dome | Injection | 8.5 | 61% | 40% | 61% | 40% | |||
| 7 | 16 | Dome | Injection | 53.9 | 47% | 10% | 70% | 25% | 40% | 5% |
| 8 | 17 | Dome | Injection | 1.8 | 28% | 24% | 38% | 30% | −23% | −5% |
| 18 | Dome + rim | Injection | 15.8 | 71% | 44% | 27% | 33% | 71% | 44% | |
| 9 | 19 | Screw hole | Injection | 6.4 | 37% | 19% | 44% | 22% | −10% | 3% |
| 10 | 20 | Dome | Injection | 21.3 | 72% | 31% | 86% | 29% | 61% | 24% |
| Treated lesions | ||||||||||
| Minimum | 1.4 | 8% | 9% | −2% | 0% | −23% | −5% | |||
| Maximum | 53.9 | 72% | 44% | 91% | 72% | 71% | 44% | |||
| Average | 16.8 | 43% | 24% | 47% | 28% | 36% | 20% | |||