Fig. 5.

Effect of starting weight on reweighting. Each point represents a single subject. Filled symbols = BadP in Block 1. Open symbols = BadV in Block 1. A: In Block 1, the first 4 weights predict absolute reweighting within Block 1, e.g., subjects who began with a high weight of vision were likely to down-weight vision (n = 80, r = −0.40, P = 0.00013). Here subjects indicated by filled symbols should have increased the weight of vision (i.e., filled symbols above the 0 line) and vice versa for subjects with open symbols. This did not occur. The fact that the center of the distribution is negative of 0 on the y axis reflects that many subjects down-weighted vision in Block 1, regardless of manipulation. B: in Block 2, the first 4 weights predict absolute reweighting within Block 2, e.g., subjects who began with a high weight of vision were likely to down-weight vision (n = 83, r = −0.36, P = 0.00076). Here subjects indicated by filled symbols should have decreased the weight of vision (i.e., filled symbols below the 0 line) and vice versa for subjects with open symbols. There was a tendency for this to occur.