Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Vis. 2009 Apr 6;9(4):7.1–716. doi: 10.1167/9.4.7

Table 3.

Summary of experimental results for each observer and their average (top), and behaviors of two cascade models involving two stages of summation and three stages of nonlinear contrast transduction (middle and bottom). The parameter P is the effective overall exponent and is estimated from the psychophysical results using Pelli’s (1987) approximation. This is the (average) estimate of the slope of the psychometric function (β̅) divided by 1.247. In the models, the overall exponent is given by the product mpu. The exponents m and p were estimated from the SRs in the ‘eyes’ and ‘area’ experiments respectively, leaving u to be set by P. The equivalent uncertainty (U) is described in the Discussion section. No degrees of freedom remained for predicting the SRs in the (main) ‘eyes and area’ experiment. Note that the model parameters in the ‘average’ column are not the averages of those in the other three columns, but the parameters fit to the data of the average observer

Observer TSM RJS SAW Average
Experimental results
 Eyes SR 4.95 5.87 4.26 5.03
 Area SR 5.10 4.83 5.00 4.98
 Eyes and area SR 4.40 4.88 3.64 4.31
 Eyes β 4.1 2.5 3.6 3.3
 Area β 3.8 2.6 3.6 3.3
 Eyes and area β 4.0 2.4 4.0 3.6
β̅ 3.9 2.5 3.7 3.3
P = (β̅/1.247) 3.2 2.0 3.0 2.7
Model: Summation across eyes then area
m 1.22 1.03 1.41 1.20
p 1.60 2.26 1.47 1.76
mp 1.95 2.32 2.07 2.11
u = P/(mp) 1.62 0.86 1.45 1.26
 Equivalent uncertainty (U) 14 N/A 7 3
 Predicted SR for ‘eyes
  and area’
4.27 4.69 3.70 4.20
Model: Summation across area then eyes
m 1.95 2.32 2.08 2.11
p 0.62 0.44 0.68 0.57
mp 1.22 1.03 1.41 1.20
u = P/(mp) 2.60 1.94 2.13 2.22
 Equivalent uncertainty (U) 757 51 111 164
 Predicted SR for ‘eyes
  and area’
4.95 5.87 4.26 5.02