Table 2.
sAPPα | sAPPβ | Aβ1-42 | t-tau | p-tau | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall ANOVA: | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 |
Post Hoc Comparisons: | |||||
ADC vs NA | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ns | < 0.05 | ns |
OIs vs NA | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ns | ns |
ADC vs OIs | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
NA vs Cont y | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
AD vs Cont o | ns | ns | < 0.01 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
AD vs ADC | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ns | < 0.01 | < 0.001 |
Cont y vs Cont o | < 0.05 | ns | ns | ns | < 0.01 |
ns = not significant
* All results were also compared using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test that yielded similar results. Statistical tests were also conducted with age adjustment, which did not change any of the results reported above, except for that differences between younger and older controls disappeared.