Table 1. Diversity and Phylogenetic Indices.
Sample | Taxon Richness | Pielou's Evenness | Inverse Simpson's Index | Nearest Taxon Index | Net Relatedness Index |
TIPS103 | 1333 | 0.9906 | 1185.09 | −1.50 | 2.26 |
TIPS104 | 1014 | 0.9934 | 933.92 | −1.04 | −0.05 |
TIPS105 | 1061 | 0.9932 | 974.79 | 1.25 | 1.39 |
TIPS106 | 1285 | 0.9938 | 1187.24 | −0.02 | −5.30 |
TIPS108 | 1158 | 0.9942 | 1076.34 | −0.30 | −0.33 |
TIPS110 | 1203 | 0.9949 | 1129.03 | −0.64 | −0.25 |
TIPS111 | 1278 | 0.9938 | 1183.64 | −2.40 | −0.67 |
TIPS114 | 950 | 0.9875 | 814.61 | −2.77 | −2.01 |
TIPS116 | 1032 | 0.9943 | 962.01 | 1.24 | 1.20 |
TIPS117 | 1161 | 0.9935 | 1069.16 | −0.72 | −2.31 |
TIPS122 | 1253 | 0.9911 | 1124.22 | −2.11 | −2.56 |
TIPS123 | 1064 | 0.9926 | 970.82 | 0.16 | 1.94 |
TIPS124 | 1117 | 0.9938 | 1033.53 | 0.82 | −2.12 |
TIPS301 | 1319 | 0.9939 | 1223.26 | −1.74 | −1.30 |
TIPS501 | 1020 | 0.9938 | 945.40 | 0.76 | 1.52 |
TIPS601 | 1100 | 0.9932 | 1010.23 | −2.22 | −1.95 |
Samples in bold text were used as the examples of high LGG abundance and those in italics as examples of low LGG abundance in the t-test analysis.