Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul-Sep;34(3):153–160. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.54850

Figure 5.

Figure 5

2D profile comparison of TPS, unprocessed profile of I'mRT MatriXX without any shift of position and processed profile of I'mRT MatriXX using multiple profiles acquisition at four different positions [(0,0); (3.81 mm, 0); (0, 3.81 mm) and (3.81 mm, 3.81 mm)]. a represents the 1D profile comparison of TPS 2D dose map (b), unprocessed (c) and processed (d) 2D dose maps of I'mRT MatriXX. Improvement of gamma histogram evaluation (delta distance = 3 mm and delta dose = 3%) by 5% from (e) TPS vs. unprocessed 2D profile to (f) TPS vs. processed 2D profile