Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):189–193. doi: 10.1155/2009/912185

Table 6.

Diagnostic characteristics of the per cent predicted method, using the percentile method as a reference standard using Crapo et al (57) and Gutierrez et al (12) equations for men (n=2176)

Parameter Crapo et al
Gutierrez et al
Sen, % Spe, % PPV, % NPV, % LR+ LR− Sen, % Spe, % PPV, % NPV, % LR+ LR−
FEV1 93 97 98 91 32 0.07 98 90 92 97 9 0.03
FVC 99 90 84 99 10 0.01 95 94 93 96 17 0.05
RV 100 92 50 100 13 0.00 100 87 33 100 7 0.00
RV 82 100 100 91 2264 0.18 90 92 98 96 107 0.11
TLC 93 100 97 99 189 0.07 90 99 97 97 93 0.11
TLC 94 100 98 99 357 0.06 85 100 97 98 343 0.15
DLco 88 97 97 88 32 0.12 99 91 82 99 11 0.02

↓ Below normal;

↑ Above normal, for all other parameters, only below normal are presented; DLco Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; FEV1 Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC Forced vital capacity; LR+ Positive likelihood ratio; LR– Negative likelihood ratio; NPV Negative predictive value; PPV Positive predictive value; RV Residual volume; Sen Sensitivity; Spe Specificity; TLC Total lung capacity