Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun 26;201(2):177.e1–177.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.03.031

TABLE 5.

Relative hazards (95% CI) of incident metabolic syndrome among interim birth groups

Models No. of births by GDM status
0 births
(referent)
(n = 706)
1 non-GDM birth
(n = 276)
2 + non-GDM births
(n = 381)
1 + GDM births
(n = 88)
Unadjusted 1.0 0.96 (0.68–1.35) 0.94 (0.69–1.29) 1.88 (1.21–2.91)
Model 1 = adjusted for race and baseline age 1.0 0.93 (0.66–1.31) 1.04 (0.75–1.43) 1.94 (1.25–3.01)
Model 2 = model 1 + baseline education and smoking 1.0 0.92 (0.65–1.30) 1.11 (0.80–1.53) 2.15 (1.38–3.34)
Model 3 = model 2 + baseline BMI 1.0 1.12 (0.79–1.59) 1.44 (1.04–2.01) 2.27 (1.45–3.57)
Model 4 = model 3 + baseline waist girth 1.0 1.30 (0.91–1.85) 1.58 (1.13–2.21) 2.53 (1.60–4.00)
Model 5 = model 4 + all other baseline MetS components 1.0 1.33 (0.93–1.90) 1.62 (1.16–2.26) 2.42 (1.52–3.83)
Model 6 (fully adjusted) = model 5 + baseline physical activity 1.0 1.33 (0.93–1.91) 1.62 (1.16–2.26) 2.43 (1.53–3.86)
Model 6 + time-dependent physical activity (mediator) 1.0 1.25 (0.87–1.79) 1.41 (1.01–1.97) 2.05 (1.29–3.27)
Model 6 + time-dependent weight gain (mediator) 1.0 1.09 (0.76–1.58) 1.35 (0.95–1.90) 1.77 (1.10–2.84)

BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; MetS, metabolic syndrome; n, number of women within each group at end of follow-up.