Table 2.
Reviewed Studies by Instructional Focus
| Author | Design | Participants | Setting & Intervention | Duration | Measures | Treatment Effects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Code-Focused Studies | ||||||
| Basil & Reyes, 2003 | Pre- post-test design | 2 students with ASD: 1. 13-yr. old; MA = 4 yrs; Reading: limited sight word reading/writing. 2. 8-yr. old with intellectual disability; MA = 7 yrs; Reading: limited sight word reading/writing, described as difficult to involve in reading tasks. |
Self-contained classroom (Spain). One to one computer – assisted instruction |
30 minutes, twice a week for 3 months; total = 12 hrs. | End of lesson test. Spanish standardized test measuring writing (i.e., dictation, free composition, copying) and reading (i.e., letters, syllables, words, text, and comprehension) | Mastered all 10 lessons and passed the end of lesson tests at the end of 3 months. One participant demonstrated gains in phonological awareness, word spelling and spontaneous written composition on standardized measure. |
| Coleman-Martin, Heller, Chihak, & Irvine, 2005 | Multiple conditions design with drop-down baselines | 1 12-yr. old with ASD; MA NR; Reading: informal assessments indicated 2 grade level word recognition skills | Self-contained classroom. One to one computer-assisted sight word instruction. |
Instruction provided until 80% correct for 2 consecutive sessions. Minimum of 4 sessions; total = NR | Sight word measure (identified a target word from 3 similar distracter words). | Criterion reached in 3 sessions in computer-assisted condition; in 4 sessions during teacher only condition; and in 6 sessions during teacher + computer condition. |
| Heiman, Nelson, Tjus, Gillberg (1995) | Pre- post- test with follow-up | 11 children with ASD Mean CA = 9:4 yrs. (range of 6–13) Mean MA = 7 yrs. (SD = 2) Reading: NR |
Self-contained school (Sweden) One to one computer-assisted instruction. |
Averaged 26 sessions (range 21–32 minutes); approximate total = 13 hrs. | End of lesson test. Swedish standardized test of phonological awareness, word identification, sentence reading, and sentence imitation. Observations of communication. |
Completed end of lesson tests with a mean of 92% correct and SD of 8.4. Increased mean scores on reading measures from pre- to post-test and at follow-up; increased mean scores on PA measures from pre- to post-test, but decreased at follow-up; sentence imitation results inconclusive. Observations revealed increased interaction during intervention |
| Tjus, Heimann & Nelson (1998) | Pre- post- test with follow-up | 13 students with ASD Mean CA = 10 yrs. (range of 4–11) Mean MA = 7.3 yrs. (SD = 2) Reading: NR |
Self-contained classroom (Sweden) One to one computer-assisted instruction. |
Averaged 15 sessions (range 15–30 minutes); approximate total = 7.5 hrs. | End of lesson test. Swedish standardized test of phonological awareness, word identification, sentence reading, and sentence imitation. |
Increased mean scores from pre- to posttest on reading measures; decline at the follow-up; increased mean scores on PA from pre- to post-test and at follow-up; proportion of correct sentences increased minimally, but response time significantly decreased |
|
Meaning Focused Studies | ||||||
| Dugan, et al., 1995 | Reversal Design | 16 4th grade general education peers 2 4th grade students with ASD; 1. 10-yr. old female with moderate cognitive disability (MA: NR); Reading: Difficulty with comprehension 2. 9-yr. old male w/HFA; Reading: difficulty with comprehension |
4th grade general education social studies class. 10-minute teacher-directed social studies lecture; heterogeneous peer tutoring and cooperative learning activities. |
40 minute class periods, 4 days a week for 8 weeks; total = 21 hrs. | Researcher-made social studies curriculum tests: 15 vocabulary terms and sentence creation using terms. Observations of academic and social engagement |
Mean gain scores of participants with ASD increased from pre (m = 0–2) to posttest (m = 5 to 8.6). Mean gain scores of general education peers also increased from pre to posttest. Levels of engagement of participants with ASD and peers increased. |
| Kamps, Leonard, Potucek & Garrison-Harrell (1995) | Reversal design with random assignment | 3 children with ASD 1. 8 yr old w/HFA; IQ Score: 101; 3rd grade; Reading: difficulty with comprehension 2. 13 yr old with autism; IQ score = 50; 5th grade; Reading: Able to read and write, but difficulty with comprehension 3. 12 yr old with autism; IQ score: 46; 5th grade; Reading: primary level; difficulty with comprehension of language and text. |
General education 3rd and 5th grade classroom Participants randomly assigned roles during cooperative learning groups (n = 4 students): (1) reviewing vocabulary words, (2) responding to wh comprehension questions following reading, (3) comprehension game of characters and facts from stories read in class. |
30–40 minute sessions for approximately 14 weeks; approximate total = 35–47 hours | Weekly researcher-made vocabulary and comprehension tests on reading chapters with 15 items including, comprehension, vocabulary, and sequencing questions. Academic and social engagement. Teacher satisfaction survey. |
Participant with HFA increased gain scores on weekly tests from baseline (m = 4; 3.7) to intervention (m = 7.8; 8.7); General education peers increased mean gain scores on weekly tests after intervention; Greater variability for 2 participants with autism with gains from baseline (range 0–3; 0–4) to intervention (range 1–6; 0–4). All participants increased levels of engagement. Teachers reported high levels of satisfaction for whole class and for the child with HFA, but lower levels for the 2 children with cognitive disability. |
| O’Connor & Klein, 2004 | Repeated measures within subjects design | 20 children with ASD 10 w/autism, 6 w/Asperger syndrome, and 4 w/PDD Mean age = 15; range = 14–17; SD = 1; Reading: all participants have average or above decoding skills but lower levels of reading comprehension. |
Home or school setting One to one instruction. Students read stories aloud under 2 control and 3 treatment conditions: prereading question; anaphoric cuing; cloze. |
10-minute conditions Total = 1 hour. | Researcher-made test of comprehension questions. | Anaphoric cuing resulted in medium effect size gains (1/2 SD above results in control condition) of more than half of participants. Gains from prereading questions and cloze conditions were small and not statistically significant. |
| Rosenbaum & Breiling (1976) | ABA Reversal Design | 12 yr old female with ASD; MA and IQ NR; Reading: limited decoding ability and comprehension. | Clinical setting. One to one instruction in reading directions (e.g., stand up, point to your mouth, point to the man writing, etc.) presented for 10 second trials. |
Initially 17 daily 15–20 minute sessions; followed by 17 twice a day sessions; approximate total = 15 hrs. | Researcher-made observational recording scale based on level of prompting required for a correct response. | 100% mastery by 12th session and maintained when reward removed; Generalized across experimenters and conditions-except when researcher absent, but when reentered room performance near 100% |
| Whalon & Hanline, in press | Multiple baseline across participants | 3 children w/ASD 1. 7-yr. old with Asperger syndrome; IQ = 101; Reading: difficulty with retell; 2. 8-yr. old with ASD; Nonverbal IQ = 112; 3. 7 – yr. old with PDD; Nonverbal IQ = 92; Reading: difficulty with retell |
Small group setting outside of general education classroom. Reciprocal questioning in cooperative pairs. |
30–40 minutes 4 days a week for 3 weeks; approximate total = 7 hrs. | Frequency of question generation and unprompted responses to questions generated by peers. Participant satisfaction survey. |
Increased generation of and response to questions. Prompting occurred throughout intervention but decreased. Questions became less generic and more varied and specific; Participants perceived the intervention as helpful and parents noted a difference in their children’s reading |
|
Multi-component Studies | ||||||
| Kamps, Barbetta, Leonard & Delquadri (1994) | Multiple Baseline across subjects | 3 children w/HFA 1. 8-yr. old; IQ = 101; 1/2nd grade classroom; Reading: at or above 2nd grade level 2. 8-yr. old; IQ = 71; 2nd grade; Reading: 2nd grade but difficulty with reading comprehension and completing tasks 3. 9-yr. old; IQ NR; 3rd grade; Reading: grade level on most academic tasks |
General education 1st/2nd, 2nd and 3rd grade classrooms. Classwide peer tutoring. |
25–30 minutes; 3–4 times per week; Number of sessions varied (range of 14 to 35 sessions); total = unclear or a range of 6–17 hours | Researcher-made measures of words read correctly per minute (and errors); response to comprehension questions. Duration of social interaction (i.e., initiation – response sequence) |
Participants increased mean number of words read correctly per minute (19, 31, & 12 words); Number of errors decreased by one student (from 6 to 2) and remained low at 2–3 words per minute for the other 2 participants. Participants increased the percentage of correct responses to comprehension questions (47%, 24% & 67% at baseline to 76%, 68% & 90%). Increased duration of social communication. |
| Kamps, Locke, Delquadri & Hall, 1989 | Multiple baseline across tasks | 2 children with autism 1. 9-yr. old; IQ =50; Reading: good decoding but poor comprehension 2. 11-yr. old; IQ =50 and 50; Reading: good decoding but poor comprehension. |
Self-contained 5th grade general education class. Peer tutoring in money skills, expressive language, and oral reading/comprehension. Oral reading fluency and comprehension. |
20 minutes 3 times a week for approximately 6 weeks. Total = approximately 5–6 hours. |
Number of words read correctly and errors per minute from a 2 min timed reading. Number of correct responses to factual comprehension questions |
Participant mean reading rates increased following intervention (m = 19.6 and 30.2 at baseline to 34.2 and 39.7) and the number of errors decreased (m=3.7; m=1.9at baseline to m = 1.3;, m = .9) Participants increased the number of correct responses to factual comprehension questions (1.9; 1.3 during baseline to 3.8 and 3.5) |