Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychotherapy (Chic). 2009 Sep 1;46(3):362–375. doi: 10.1037/a0017002

Table 1.

Change in quality of object relations and ego functions, neuroticism, agreeableness, impulsiveness and psychological mindedness.

Variable Time Treatment n M SD Effect size Adjusted effect size
Quality of object relations and ego functions
Intake SEP 78 2.04 .35
Control 74 2.10 .30
Follow-up SEP 48 1.79 .39 −.59 −.82
Control 44 1.77 .41 −.68 −.82

T-score

Neuroticism
Intake SEP 78 60.67 8.66
Control 72 61.91 8.14
Termination SEP 55 56.84 8.27 −.34 −.30
Control 46 58.95 10.0 −.15 −.18
Follow-up SEP 60 58.49 9.50 −.37 −.39
Control 51 55.96 8.90 −.61 −.86
Agreeableness
Intake SEP 78 54.58 8.34
Control 73 53.24 7.49
Termination SEP 54 51.39 8.41 −.25 −.34
Control 46 52.56 7.88 −.12 −.11
Follow-up SEP 60 51.25 7.39 −.44 −.43
Control 51 49.91 6.32 −.38 −.31
Impulsiveness
Intake SEP 78 47.94 7.64
Control 72 49.84 8.55
Termination SEP 50 48.18 8.35 .02 .01
Control 45 48.26 7.82 −.06 −.016
Follow-up SEP 60 48.06 8.2 .00 −.15
Control 51 50.06 7.97 −.02 .06

Psychological Mindedness
Intake SEP 73 2.09 .29
Control 70 2.06 .26
Termination SEP 51 2.02 .32 −.06 −.02
Control 48 1.97 .26 −.30 −.33
Follow-up SEP 57 2.09 .31 .07 .19
Control 49 1.97 .29 −.26 −.27

Interpersonal problems average
Intake SEP 78 1.28 .48
Control 74 1.31 .46
Termination SEP 51 1.09 .53 .21 .13
Control 49 1.15 .54 .19 .18
Follow-up SEP 63 1.06 .52 .42 .40
Control 52 1.16 .69 .17 .15