Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 28;3:141–154. doi: 10.4137/bbi.s3030

Table 1.

Comparative analysis of CDS/intron classification by SCF and UFM.

Species Size, bp CSF
UFM
Sn1 Sp2 F-score3 Sn4 Sp5 F-score
H. sapiens 300 88.8 74.6 81.1 100.0 76.0 86.4
400 86.6 87.6 87.1 100.0 88.0 93.6
500 85.2 93.6 89.2 100.0 93.0 96.4
600 84.2 93.4 88.6 100.0 97.4 98.7
D. melanogaster 300 95.2 71.4 81.6 99.8 97.4 98.6
400 95.8 82.8 88.8 99.8 97.8 98.8
500 93.4 89.6 91.5 100.0 98.6 99.3
600 94.8 92.6 93.7 100.0 98.6 99.3
A. thaliana 300 90.8 59.6 72.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
400 82.2 78.8 80.5 100.0 100.0 100.0
500 78.6 90.8 84.3 100.0 100.0 100.0
600 78.8 93.0 85.3 100.0 100.0 100.0
1

Sensitivity (%) of CSF for τ = 75.

2

Specificity (%) of CSF for τ = 75.

3

F-score (%) = 2*Sn*Sp/(Sn + Sp).

4

Sensitivity (%) of UFM for τ = 1.

5

Specificity (%) of UFM for τ = 1.