Table 3.
Good FR herds |
Low FR herds |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evaluation step | Parameter | Percent positive | N | Percent positive | N | Pb |
Herd survey | Feed tested for mycotoxins | 100.0 | 6 | 61.9 | 21 | 0.14 |
Gestating sows fed 2×/day | 50.0 | 6 | 16.7 | 24 | 0.12 | |
Weaned sows fed 2×/day | 66.7 | 6 | 25.0 | 24 | 0.18 | |
Weaned sows fed gestation ration | 0.0 | 6 | 41.7 | 24 | 0.14 | |
Weaned sows fed lactation ration | 66.7 | 6 | 29.2 | 24 | 0.16 | |
Swollen vulva used as sign to detect estrus | 83.3 | 6 | 34.8 | 23 | 0.06 | |
Vaginal mucus used as sign to detect estrus | 16.7 | 6 | 52.2 | 23 | 0.18 | |
Hormonesa used to induce estrus in weaned sows | 100.0 | 6 | 60.9 | 23 | 0.14 | |
Erysipelas present in herd | 33.3 | 6 | 70.8 | 24 | 0.16 | |
PRRSv vaccine used in breeding herd | 100.0 | 6 | 62.5 | 24 | 0.14 | |
Breeding observation | Hands-free AI used | 0.0 | 5 | 60.0 | 20 | 0.04 |
Vulvas wiped before breeding | 20.0 | 5 | 75.0 | 20 | 0.04 | |
Semen evaluation | Poor quality fresh semen | 0.0 | 5 | 38.8 | 18 | 0.15 |
Poor quality stored semen | 40.0 | 5 | 55.5 | 18 | 0.64 |
Pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin and human chorionic gonadotrophin (P.G. 600; Intervet Canada, Whitby, Ontario).
Fisher’s exact test used to determine statistical differences.