Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb;51(2):185–189.

Table 3.

Proportion of herds with selected parameters in good (≥ 85%) and low (< 85%) farrowing rate (FR) categories from a herd evaluation completed on 30 commercial swine farms in Ontario

Good FR herds
Low FR herds
Evaluation step Parameter Percent positive N Percent positive N Pb
Herd survey Feed tested for mycotoxins 100.0 6 61.9 21 0.14
Gestating sows fed 2×/day 50.0 6 16.7 24 0.12
Weaned sows fed 2×/day 66.7 6 25.0 24 0.18
Weaned sows fed gestation ration 0.0 6 41.7 24 0.14
Weaned sows fed lactation ration 66.7 6 29.2 24 0.16
Swollen vulva used as sign to detect estrus 83.3 6 34.8 23 0.06
Vaginal mucus used as sign to detect estrus 16.7 6 52.2 23 0.18
Hormonesa used to induce estrus in weaned sows 100.0 6 60.9 23 0.14
Erysipelas present in herd 33.3 6 70.8 24 0.16
PRRSv vaccine used in breeding herd 100.0 6 62.5 24 0.14
Breeding observation Hands-free AI used 0.0 5 60.0 20 0.04
Vulvas wiped before breeding 20.0 5 75.0 20 0.04
Semen evaluation Poor quality fresh semen 0.0 5 38.8 18 0.15
Poor quality stored semen 40.0 5 55.5 18 0.64
a

Pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin and human chorionic gonadotrophin (P.G. 600; Intervet Canada, Whitby, Ontario).

b

Fisher’s exact test used to determine statistical differences.