Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 19;340:b5631. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b5631

Table 5.

 Summary of effects of home based versus centre based cardiac rehabilitation21 22 24-36

Outcome or subgroup No of studies No of participants Summary estimate and model Effect estimate (95% CI) Heterogeneity
χ2 df P value I2 (%)
Exercise capacity:
 At 3-12 month follow-up 14 1938 Standard mean difference, random effects model −0.11 (−0.35 to 0.13) 60.91 13 <0.001 79
 At 12-24 month follow-up 4 1074 Standard mean difference, fixed effects model 0.11 (−0.01 to 0.23) 0.87 3 0.62 0
Blood pressure (mm Hg) at 3-12 month follow-up:
 Systolic 9 1053 Mean difference, random effects model −0.51 (−4.63 to 3.61) 23.01 7 0.002 70
 Diastolic 7 927 Mean difference, random effects model 1.85 (0.74 to 2.96) 7.97 6 0.24 25
Cholesterol (mmol/l) at 3-12 month follow-up:
 Total 7 1019 Mean difference, random effects model 0.13 (−0.05 to 0.31) 13.33 6 0.04 55
 High density lipoprotein 5 793 Mean difference, fixed effects model −0.06 (−0.11 to −0.02) 4.44 3 0.22 32
 Low density lipoprotein 4 324 Mean difference, fixed effects model 0.15 (−0.01 to 0.31) 6.53 4 0.16 39
 Triglycerides 4 328 Mean difference, random effects model 0.15 (−0.11 to 0.41) 7.58 3 0.06 60
Smoking 5 922 Relative risk, fixed effects model 1.02 (0.76 to 1.37) 4.48 4 0.34 11
Completers 10 1714 Risk ratio, fixed effects model 1.00 (0.97 to 1.04) 11.4 10 0.32 13
Mortality 4 909 Relative risk, fixed effects model 1.31 (0.65 to 2.66) 1.00 3 0.80 0