Table 3.
df | After 7 months of incubation | After 14 months of incubation | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MS | F | P | r 2 | MS | F | P | r 2 | ||
Species (S) | 7 | 25,028 | 1,002.3 | <0.00001 | 0.860 | 20,321 | 481.2 | <0.0001 | 0.670 |
Forest type (F) | 1 | 3,650 | 146.1 | <0.00001 | 0.018 | 19,851 | 470.1 | <0.0001 | 0.094 |
Other species (O) | 7 | 41 | 1.6 | 0.1203 | 0.001 | 231 | 5.5 | <0.0001 | 0.008 |
S × F | 7 | 25 | 1.0 | 0.4283 | 0.001 | 131 | 3.1 | 0.003 | 0.004 |
S × O | 49 | 31 | 1.2 | 0.1370 | 0.007 | 54 | 1.3 | 0.099 | 0.012 |
O × F | 7 | 33 | 1.3 | 0.2460 | 0.001 | 55 | 1.3 | 0.25 | 0.002 |
S × O × F | 49 | 32 | 1.2 | 0.0921 | 0.008 | 48 | 1.1 | 0.25 | 0.011 |
Blocking term | 14 | 69 | 2.76 | 0.0005 | 0.005 | 428 | 10.1 | <0.0001 | 0.028 |
Residualsa | 808/858 | 25 | 42 |
The explanatory variables were the identity of the species measured (Species), the forest type (Forest), the identity of the other species in the mixture (Other species), and a blocking term reflecting the hierarchical sampling design. Statistically significant effects are shown in bold. The relative importance of a factor is expressed as its sum of squares as a proportion of the total sum of squares (r 2)
aDifferent df for the two incubation periods because the numbers of bags not recovered from the field differed between collections