Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 2;38(1):77–89. doi: 10.1007/s10802-009-9347-8

Table 1.

Correlations Between Model Variables, Study 1 and 2

Study 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
1. Rules about time
2. Rules about content 0.32
3. Reactions to excessive use 0.52 0.34
4. Communication frequency 0.24 0.12 0.12
5. Communication quality 0.02 0.05 0.12 0.29
6. CIU 0.13 −0.20 −0.17 0.06 −0.16
Study 2
7. Rules about time T1
8. Rules about time T2 0.71
9. Rules about content T1 0.32 0.31
10. Rules about content T2 0.28 0.37 0.69
11. Reactions to excessive use T1 0.59 0.48 0.43 0.41
12. Reactions to excessive use T2 0.50 0.55 0.39 0.44 0.74
13. Communication frequency T1 0.21 0.15 0.06 0.05 0.08 0.06
14. Communication frequency T2 0.18 0.21 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.15 0.63
15. Communication quality T1 −0.17 −0.15 −0.10 −0.05 −0.10 −0.03 0.28 0.27
16. Communication quality T2 −0.12 −0.08 −0.06 −0.03 −0.05 −0.01 0.23 0.32 0.59
17. CIU T1 0.18 0.15 −0.07 −0.09 −0.07 −0.05 0.02 −0.08 −0.23 −0.16
18. CIU T2 0.17 0.24 0.00 −0.09 −0.02 −0.04 −0.02 −0.04 −0.24 −0.29 0.64

Underscored values are non-significant. All significant correlations were at least significant at p < 0.05