Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 12;7(4):565–575. doi: 10.3390/md7040565

Table 1.

Comparison of NMR data for 1 isolated in the current study (1H-NMR at 600 MHz, 13C-NMR at 150 MHz, basic frequency) with that reported previously for 1 [810] and with 3.

13C δ (m) 1H δ (m,JHz) HMBC (6 Hz) gHMBC (6 Hz) 1,1-ADEQUATE

No. 1a,10 1a 3a 1a,10 1a 1b,9 1b 1c,8 1a,10 1a 1a
1 163.7 (s) 163.6 (s) 163.6 (s)
2 122.4 (d) 122.3 (d) 124.7 (d) 7.20 (s) 7.24 (d, 1.4) 7.17 (brs) 7.24 (d, 1.4) 6.73 (d, 1.2) C-4, 1’ C-1’, 1, 3, 4, 9a C-1, 3
3 156.1 (s) 156.6 (s) 154.2 (s)
4d 116.6 (d) 118.4 (d) 121.2 (d) 7.70 (s) 7.72 (d, 1.4) 7.56 (brs) 7.66 (d, 1.4) 7.16 (d, 1.2) C-2, 10, 1’ C-1’, 1, 2, 9, 9a, 10 C-3, 4a
4a 135.3 (s) 134.9 (s) 134.7 (s)
5d 113.6 (d) 110.4 (d) 109.1 (d) 7.09 (s) 7.16 (d, 2.4) 6.96 (d, 2.0) 7.02 (d, 2.5) 6.61 (d 2.0) C-10 C-6, 7, 8, 8a, 9, 10 C-6, 10a
6d 160.2 (s) 166.7 (s) 166.6 (s)
7 109.7 (d) 109.1 (d) 110.1 (d) 6.35 (d, 3.4) 6.52 (d, 2.4) 6.41 (d 2.0) 6.44 (d, 2.5) 6.02 (d, 2.0) C-5 C-5, 6, 8, 8a C-6
8 167.5 (s) 167.9 (s) 167.2 (s)
8ad 113.9 (s) 110.5 (s) 110.5 (s)
9 192.0 (s) 191.7 (s) 191.9 (s)
9ad 118.4 (s) 115.9 (s) 115.0 (s)
10 184.3 (s) 183.2 (s) 183.2 (s)
10a 136.9 (s) 136.9 (s) 136.9 (s)
1′ 75.5 (d) 75.4 (d) 39.2 (t) 4.60 (m) 4.62 (t, 6.4) 4.56 (m) 4.57 (t, 6.5) 4.19 (t, 5.8) C-2, 4 C-2’, 3’, 2, 3, 4 C-2’, 3
2′ 32.6 (t) 32.6 (t) 24.8 (t) 1.73 (m) 1.75 (m) 1.65 (m) 1.63 (m) C-3, 3′ C-1’, 3’, 3 C-1’, 3’
3′ 10.3 (q) 10.2 (q) 14.0 (q) 0.94 (t, 12.5) 0.96 (t, 7.6) 0.91 (t, 8.0) 0.86 (t, 7.3) C-1’, 2′ C-1’, 2’ C-2’
a

Measured in CD3OD, referenced to internal solvent signals (δ 3.31 and 49.0 ppm).

b

Measured in DMSO d6, referenced to internal solvent signals (δ2.50).

c

Measured in (CD3)2CO, referenced to TMS (δ0).

d

NMR resonances and coupling constants associated with atoms at these positions are not consistent with the current molecule and the previously reported rhodoptilometrin [10] being identical.

8–10

Data comes from references [810], see main text.