Table 4.
Region | Age (years) | Length of follow-up (years) | Institutional population included | Sample size | Indicator | Yearly change (age-adjusted) | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1984–199651 | USA | 40–59 | 12 | No | NHIS | Unable to attend to personal care needs: severe disability | 1·20% | ns |
1984–199651 | USA | 40–59 | 12 | No | NHIS | Unable to attend to or restricted in personal care needs: severe and moderate disability | 1·62% | 0·05 |
1997/98–2005/0649 | USA | 40–59 | 8 | No | NHIS | ADL | 2·17% | 0·01 |
1997/98–2005/0649 | USA | 40–59 | 8 | No | NHIS | IADL | −0·97% | ns |
1984–199651 | USA | 60–69 | 12 | No | NHIS | Unable to attend to personal care needs: severe disability | −0·09% | ns |
1984–199651 | USA | 60–69 | 12 | No | NHIS | Unable to attend to or restricted in personal care needs: severe and moderate disability | −0·31% | ns |
1991/92–1996/9747 | UK | 65–69 | 5 | Yes | 689–687 | IADL/ADL | 6·80% | 0·06 |
1987–200136 | Netherlands | >55 | 14 | No | 2708–3474 | Men: ADL | −4·57% | 0·05 |
1987–200136 | Netherlands | >55 | 14 | No | 2708–3474 | Women: ADL | −4·29% | 0·05 |
1993–199968 | Spain | >64 | 6 | No | 1283 | ADL | −9·54% | 0·05 |
1980/81–1991/9281 | France | >65 | 11 | No | 5000 | Being hampered or disabled | −1·60% | ·· |
1991/92–2002/0381 | France | >65 | 11 | No | 5000 | Being hampered or disabled | −5·50% | ·· |
1982–199482 | USA | >65 | 12 | Yes | NLTCS | ADL low disability levels | −0·90% | ·· |
1994–2004/0582 | USA | >65 | 10 | Yes | NLTCS | ADL low disability levels | −1·70% | ·· |
1982–199482 | USA | >65 | 12 | Yes | NLTCS | ADL high disability levels | −1·40% | ·· |
1994–2004/0582 | USA | >65 | 10 | Yes | NLTCS | ADL high disability levels | −2·40% | ·· |
1986–199967 | Spain | >65 | 13 | Part | 750 192 men | ADL and function | −3·97% | ·· |
1986–199967 | Spain | >65 | 13 | Part | 1 323 261 women | ADL and function | −3·29% | ·· |
1986–199967 | Spain | >65 | 13 | Part | 750 192 | Men: BADL | 0·50% | ·· |
1986–199967 | Spain | >65 | 13 | Part | 1 323 261 | Women: BADL | 1·92% | ·· |
1993/95–2001/0380 | Finland | 65–84 | 8 | Yes | 1972–1905 | Women: BADL | −6·25% | 0·05 |
1993/95–2001/0380 | Finland | 65–84 | 8 | Yes | 2021–1908 | Men: BADL | −5·13% | 0·05 |
1993–200270 | Japan | >66 | 9 | No | 1786–2391 | Any IADL/ADL | −3·99% | 0·00 |
1993–200270 | Japan | >66 | 9 | No | 1786–2391 | Any limitation | −1·94% | 0·10 |
1988–200077 | Europe | >70 | 12 | No | 3496 | Women: self-care disability | −7·20% | 0·03 |
1988–200077 | Europe | >70 | 12 | No | 3496 | Men: self-care disability | −2·60% | 0·05 |
1982–200183 | USA | >70 | 19 | Yes | 7500–12 000 | Difficulty, needs/receives help | 1·0−2·5% | ·· |
1982–200384 | USA | >70 | 21 | No | 178 384 (all waves) | ADL/IADL | −1·38% | 0·01 |
1995–200485 | USA | >75 | 9 | No | 23 229 (all waves) | ADL | −1·46% | 0·01 |
1995–200485 | USA | >75 | 9 | No | 23 229 (all waves) | IADL | 1·06% | ns |
1992–200237 | Sweden | >77 | 10 | Yes | 537–561 | IADL | −0·70% | ns |
1992–200237 | Sweden | >77 | 10 | Yes | 537–561 | ADL | 0·70% | ns |
1977–199969 | USA | 79–88 | 22 | No | 177–174 | Women: ADL and function | −2·43% | 0·00 |
1977–199969 | USA | 79–88 | 22 | No | 103–119 | Men: ADL and function | −2·10% | 0·00 |
1895 cohort vs 1905 cohort79 | Denmark | >100 | 10 | Yes | 162–189 | Women: BADL | −1·19% | 0·01 |
1895 cohort vs 1905 cohort79 | Denmark | >100 | 10 | Yes | 45–36 | Men: BADL | 0·61% | ns |
Calculation of yearly change based on prevalences: (last year–first year)/first year/number of years in follow-up x100. Calculation of yearly change based on odds ratio: −(1−OR)/number of years in follow-up x100. Positive values show an increase in disability. Negative values show a reduction in disability. NHIS=National Health Interview Survey. ns=not significant. ADL=activities of daily living. IADL=instrumental activities of daily living. NLTCS=National Long Term Care Survey. BADL=basic activities of daily living.