Table 2.
Comparison of tetramer and octamer modal distances (nanometre) obtained from PELDOR data (where multiple peaks are present, and the modal distance is taken from the most intense peak)
| Probe positions | Tetramer (nm) | Octamer (nm) | ΔDistance (octamer − tetramer) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group C | |||
| H3M90a | 5.5 | 5.9 | 0.4 |
| H3Q125 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0.0 |
| H4N25 | 6.8 | 6.7 | −0.1 |
| H4T30 | 6.8 | 6.7 | −0.1 |
| H4S47 | 2.7 | 2.6 | −0.1 |
| H4L49 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 0.0 |
| H4R67 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 0.1 |
| H4T71 | 4.4 | 4.3 | −0.1 |
| Group D | |||
| H4R45 | 3.4 | 3.3 | −0.1 |
| H4V60 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 0.1 |
| H4E63 | 2.3 | 4.6 | 2.3 |
| H4T82 | 4.8 | 5.1 | 0.3 |
| H3V46 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 0.5 |
| H3R49 | 6.4 | 6.3 | −0.1 |
| H3L65 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 |
| H3Q76 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 |
aThe apparently large Δdistance is due to a change in the shape of the distribution rather than a gross movement in the distribution position.