Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 26.
Published in final edited form as: Contraception. 2007 Dec 3;77(1):10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.09.013

Table 3.

Probability of failure within the first 12 months of use by socioeconomic characteristics of users in the United States: weighted data corrected for underreporting of abortion in the 1995 and 2002 NSFG

1995
2002
Difference
95% 95% 1995/2002:
Proba-
bility
Confidence
interval
Proba-
bility
Confidence
interval
p-value
Age
<20 15.6 (12.9 – 18.7) 13.1 (10.6 – 16.0) 0.278
20–24 17.1 (14.5 – 20.1) 14.3 (12.0 – 17.1) * 0.248
25–29 14.6 (12.0 – 17.7) 14.9 (12.2 – 18.1) * 0.473
30+ 11.9 (9.7 – 14.6) 8.2 (6.4 – 10.4) 0.144
Race/Ethnicity
Black 23.9 (20.7 – 27.5) * 21.3 (17.8 – 25.2) * 0.310
Hispanic 18.4 (14.8 – 22.6) 15.0 (12.3 – 18.2) 0.261
White/Others 12.6 (11.1 – 14.4) 10.1 (8.7 – 11.7) 0.149
Intention status
Did not intend more 14.3 (12.0 – 17.0) 9.2 (7.5 – 11.3) * 0.068
Intended more/Don't know 15.1 (13.5 – 16.8) 13.9 (12.4 – 15.6) 0.309
Parity (previous births)
0 14.3 (12.4 – 16.6) 6.2 (4.8 – 7.8) 0.002
1 15.9 (13.3 – 18.7) 18.0 (15.2 – 21.0) * 0.310
2 or more 14.8 (12.5 – 17.4) 16.3 (14.1 – 18.7) * 0.338
Poverty status
<100% 25.5 (21.7 – 29.7) * 19.9 (19.3 – 20.6) * 0.094
100 – 199% 17.3 (14.4 – 20.7) 17.8 (17.3 – 18.4) * 0.442
200% or more 11.6 (10.1 – 13.3) 8.4 (7.1 – 9.9) 0.079
Union status
Cohabiting 28.7 (23.3 – 34.8) * 21.7 (18.3 – 25.5) * 0.165
Formerly married 23.1 (17.6 – 29.8) * 12.2 (8.2 – 17.9) 0.108
Never married 15.4 (13.3 – 17.7) * 11.5 (9.6 – 13.7) 0.110
Married 10.4 (8.7 – 12.3) 9.5 (7.9 – 11.5) 0.376
*

subgroup estimate is significantly different from reference group at p < .0.5

Note: For comparisons of statistically significant differences between subgroups within year, the siginficance for each group is measured relative to the reference group, indicated by italics (e.g., significance for younger age groups are relative to those ages 30+).