Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2009 Oct 1;115(19):4576–4585. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24495

Table 1.

Clinical Correlation of YAP Expression in HCC

Clinicopathologic Features Total No. of Patients, N=177 No. of Patients P
YAP Positive YAP Negative
Age (mean ± SD), y 53.9 ± 12.2 52.8 ± 12.7 55.8 ± 11.2 .111
Sex
    Men 143 90 53
    Women 34 20 14 .657
Hepatitis
    Negative 62 41 21
    HBV/HCV 115 69 46 .516
No. of tumor nodules
    1 136 86 50
    ≥2 41 24 17 .587
Tumor size (mean±SD), cm* 7.3 ± 4.6 6.9 ± 4.4 8.0 ± 4.8 .142
Serum AFP level, ng/mL
    ≤400 107 53 54
    >400 70 57 13 <.001
Venous infiltration
    Absent 85 50 35
    Present 90 59 31 .358
Cellular differentiation§
    Well differentiated (1-2) 33 13 20
    Moderately differentiated (3) 89 57 32
    Poorly differentiated (4) 30 21 9 .021
Adjacent nontumor liver status
    Noncirrhotic 18 8 10
    Chronic hepatitis 58 36 22
    Cirrhotic 101 66 35 .242
AJCC tumor stage
    I 71 42 29
    II 54 34 20
    III 52 34 18 .772

YAP indicates Yes-associated protein; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; SD, standard deviation; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; AFP, α-fetoprotein; AJCC, American Joint Commission on Cancer.

*

Tumor size was measured by the length of the largest tumor nodule.

Statistically significant.

Venous infiltration was defined based findings on final pathologic analysis (microscopic and major).

§

Scoring was based on Edmonson grade. Partial data are not available, and statistics were based on available data.