Table 2.
Comparison of results between 2007 and 2008
Subject | 2007, % | 2008, % |
---|---|---|
Laparoscopic surgery | ||
Residents who have participated in more than 10 laparoscopic radical nephrectomies in the last year | 64 | 71 |
Residents who believe laparoscopic radical nephrectomy to be the gold standard | 93 | 100 |
Residents who have participated in a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the last year | 64 | 68 |
Residents who believe laparoscopic radical prostatectomy looks promising | 61 | 46 |
Robotic surgery | ||
Residents training at institutions where urological robotic procedures are performed | 4 | 36 |
Residents who think robotic surgery will increase in the future | 75 | 71 |
Residents who plan on doing robotic surgery after residency | 29 | 39 |
Education | ||
Residents who train at institutions with fellowship-trained laparoscopic surgeons | 77 | 86 |
Residents who rank their current experience with laparoscopy as good or extensive | 71 | 64 |
Residents who plan on doing fellowship after residency | 73 | 79 |
Proportion of residents pursuing a fellowship in laparoscopy | 37 | 50 |
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy | ||
Residents training at institutions where percutaneous access is obtained primarily by urologists | 43 | 32 |
Residents who plan on performing their own percutaneous access in the future | 63 | 37 |
Percutaneous ablative surgery | ||
Residents training at institutions where percutaneous needle ablative procedures are performed | 61 | 82 |
Proportion of these percutaneous procedures performed by radiologists | 71 | 61 |