Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Decis Making. 2008 Aug 27;30(1):76–83. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08317012

Table 3.

Frequency of Prognostic Language in the 50 Conferences

Proportion of
Conferences
(n=50) n (%)a
Probabilistic 41 (82)
Numeric 10 (20)
Qualitative 36 (72)
Absolute 13 (26)
Nonprobabilistic 20 (40)
General terms 19 (38)
Opinion based 9 (18)
Uncertainty based 8 (16)
Emotion based 3 (6)
Best-worst possible 4 (8)
a

Percentages add to greater than 100% because in some conferences, physicians used more than 1 type of language to communicate prog-nosis within a single family conference.