TABLE IV.
Availability of EmploymentType and Day Labor Status in Sample and as Applied to All Work-Related Cases
| Employment type: n (%) |
Day labor status: n (%) |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic | SSN | n | Definite | Probable/ tentative |
Unknown | Definite | Probable/ tentative |
Unknown | Weight of each groupa |
| N | Y | 38 | 2 (5) | 18 (47) | 18 (47) | 20 (53) | 8 (21) | 10 (26) | 0.829 |
| N | N | 37 | 2 (5) | 19 (51) | 16 (43) | 25 (68) | 3 (8) | 9 (24) | 0.034 |
| Y | Y | 40 | 6 (15) | 21 (53) | 13 (33) | 23 (58) | 5 (13) | 12 (30) | 0.105 |
| Y | N | 40 | 4 (10) | 12 (30) | 24 (60) | 12 (30) | 4 (10) | 24 (60) | 0.032 |
| Total | 155 | 14 (9) | 70 (45) | 71 (46) | 80 (52) | 20 (13) | 53 (34) | ||
| Estimated % of cases identifiableb | 6% | 47% | 46% | 53% | 19% | 28% | |||
a
The proportion of all 1,296 work-related cases constituted by each group, for example, non-Hispanics with SSN make up 82.9% of work-related cases.
b
Estimated proportion of all work-related cases which would be identifiable using chart abstraction. Original percentages are multiplied by their corresponding “weight“; for example, 5% of non-Hispanics with SSN were assigned a “Definite” employment type, which is multiplied by 0.829. The 5% of non-Hispanics lacking SSN were multiplied by a weight of 0.034, and so on. Percentages were then summed.