TABLE 4.
Evidence of Mediator |
Role of Mediator |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention Effect on Comfort with Communication |
|||||
Mediator | Effect of Intervention on Mediator p Value |
Effect of Mediator on Comfort with Communication p Value |
Without Controlling for Mediator |
With Controlling; for Mediator |
Reduction of Intervention Effect on Comfort with Communication (%) |
Prevention | <.001 | <.001 | .203*** | .075*** | .128(63%) |
Reaction | .002 | <.001 | .203*** | .186*** | .017(8%) |
Communication efficacy | <.001 | <.001 | .203*** | .128*** | .075(37%) |
Adolescent approval | <.001 | <.001 | .203*** | .166*** | .037(18%) |
Family approval | <.001 | <.001 | .203*** | .175*** | .028(14%) |
Church approval abstinence | <.001 | <.001 | .203*** | .183*** | .020(10%) |
Church approval condom use | .002 | <.001 | .203*** | .189*** | .014(7%) |
Table covers all time points.
p < .001.