TABLE 5.

Association Between LV Geometric Patterns and Ischemic Stroke

	Concentric Hypertrophy		Eccentric Hypertrophy		Concentric Remodeling
	Unadjusted OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR* (95% CI)	Unadjusted OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR* (95% CI)	Unadjusted OR (95% CI)	Adjusted OR* (95% CI)
Entire group	3.8 (2.2–6.5)	3.5 (2.0–6.2)	2.9 (2.0–4.3)	2.4 (1.6–3.7)	1.7 (1.0–2.8)	1.7 (1.0–2.9)
Men	3.9 (1.7–8.9)	4.3 (1.8–10)	3.4 (1.9–6.0)	2.7 (1.4–5.0)	1.5 (0.7–2.9)	1.6 (0.8–3.3)
Women	3.6 (1.8–7.5)	2.9 (1.4–6.3)	2.7 (1.7–4.4)	2.3 (1.3–3.8)	2.0 (1.0–4.1)	1.8 (0.9–3.8)
Age 41–59 y	5.8 (1.2–27)	6.0 (1.2–31)	3.2 (1.5–6.7)	2.5 (1.1–5.4)	1.5 (0.4–5.4)	1.6 (0.4–5.9)
Age ≥60 y	3.5 (1.9–6.4)	3.2 (1.7–6.0)	2.9 (1.9–4.4)	2.4 (1.5–3.9)	1.7 (1.0–2.9)	1.5 (0.8–2.7)
White	4.0 (0.7–21)	4.0 (0.8–20)	6.1 (2.2–17)	5.0 (1.7–15)	2.0 (0.5–8.2)	2.2 (0.4–11)
Black	2.5 (1.1–6.1)	2.5 (1.0–6.2)	2.3 (1.1–4.8)	2.0 (0.9–4.4)	1.2 (0.5–2.7)	1.2 (0.5–2.8)
Hispanic	4.8 (2.2–10)	4.3 (1.9–9.8)	2.8 (1.7–4.6)	2.3 (1.3–4.0)	2.0 (1.0–4.0)	2.0 (1.0–4.1)

All comparisons were with normal LV geometry.

^*Adjusted for arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart failure.