Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 22;10(12):R142. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-12-r142

Table 3.

Comparison of CSDeconv with "simplified" CSDeconv

DosR data GABP data


Motif match for CSDeconv Motif match for simplified CSDeconv Motif match for CSDeconv Motif match for simplified CSDeconv


88,125.5 88,124.5 60,209,242
434,926.5 434,925.5 60,209,279
665,861.5 665,860.5 60,209,300 60,209,299
665,882.5 60,209,320 60,209,319
668,497.5 668,498.5 60,209,356
801,480.5 60,209,397
1,639,628 1,639,629 60,209,418 60,209,417
1,960,521 1,960,520 60,355,273 60,355,274
1,960,542 60,355,294
1,960,625 1,960,624 60,355,314
1,965,472 1,965,473 60,355,334
1,965,512 1,965,513 60,355,374 60,355,375
1,965,533 60,355,395
2,056,376 2,056,377 60,355,415
2,056,410 60,355,435
2,238,919 60,483,321 60,483,320
2,238,939 2,238,940 60,508,762
2,256,475 60,508,861 60,508,862
2,256,497 2,256,498 60,589,062 60,589,061
2,279,006 2,279,007 60,589,119
2,279,027 60,589,144
2,279,063 2,279,062 60,589,163
2,949,473 2,949,472 60,784,040
2,949,496 60,784,108
2,953,075 2,953,074 60,784,168 60,784,167
2,953,099 60,784,201
2,954,793 60,802,658
2,955,032 2,955,033 60,802,702
2,955,099 60,802,724 60,802,725
2,955,477 60,802,741
3,492,093 3,492,094 60,802,761
3,496,452 3,496,453 60,802,785
3,500,832 60,802,817
3,500,854 3,500,853 60,808,690

60,808,717
60,808,763
60,808,770
60,808,789
60,808,815
60,838,195 60,838,196
60,846,664
60,846,794
60,857,070
60,878,251 60,878,250
60,878,292
60,878,366
60,878,387 60,878,388
61,517,979
61,518,050 61,518,051
61,518,359
61,741,682
61,741,862
61,741,895
61,741,918

Locations of motif matches for CSDeconv and a simplified CSDeconv that uses motif finding instead of blind deconvolution are listed for both the DosR and GABP datasets. Offsets are observed in the matching sequences for the two methods owing to differing motifs found by the methods.