TABLE 3.
Comparison between typing methods used in 105 ST398 isolates
Method/feature | Relative result by: |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rand index |
Adjusted Rand index |
Wallace's coefficients |
||||||||||
PFGE | spa typing | SCCmec typing | Origin | PFGE | spa typing | SCCmec typing | Origin | PFGE | spa typing | SCCmec typing | Origin | |
PFGE | 1 | 0.76 | 0.45 | 0.71 | 1 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.45 | 0.97 | 0.30 |
spa typing | 0.76 | 1 | 0.46 | 0.61 | 0.09 | 1 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 1 | 0.62 | 0.22 |
SCCmec typing | 0.45 | 0.46 | 1 | 0.42 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.24 | 1 | 0.23 |
Origin | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.42 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 1 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.53 | 1 |