Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 5;82(2):301–305. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0538

Table 3.

Disruption of daily living activities*

Functional considerations IBS (n = 116) UFBD (n = 23) PI-IBS (n = 50) PI-UFBD (n = 12) P
Trouble performing at work or school, mean ± SD 3.06 ± 1.65 2.83 ± 2.04 3.36 ± 1.87 2.67 ± 2.31 0.512
Missed work or school, mean ± SD 2.13 ± 1.86 1.41 ± 1.94 2.08 ± 1.99 2.00 ± 2.26 0.815
Stopped leisure activities, mean ± SD 2.35 ± 1.69 2.00 ± 2.16 3.02 ± 1.77 1.67 ± 2.02 0.017§
Embarrassed, mean ± SD 3.16 ± 2.18 2.30 ± 2.38 3.44 ± 2.52 2.25 ± 2.70 0.147
Trouble sleeping, mean ± SD 2.27 ± 1.82 1.74 ± 1.96 2.66 ± 2.03 1.92 ± 2.07 0.236
Canceled social plans, mean ± SD 2.29 ± 1.85 1.83 ± 2.17 3.02 ± 2.08 1.92 ± 2.15 0.049
Avoided planned activities, mean ± SD 1.83 ± 1.93 1.26 ± 1.83 2.72 ± 2.47 2.17 ± 2.59 0.027#
*

IBS = irritable bowel syndrome; UFBD = unclassified functional bowel disorder; PI-IBS = post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome; PI-UFBD = post-infectious unclassified functional bowel disorder.

Responses used a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (always).

Number of patients responding to this category, which may differ from total number of patients.

§

Subgroup comparisons: IBS vs. PI-IBS, P = 0.0612; IBS vs. UFBD, P = 0.7864; PI-IBS vs. PI-UFBD, P = 0.0205.

Subgroup comparisons: IBS vs. UFBD, P < 0.0741; IBS vs. PI-IBS, P = 0.9430; PI-IBS vs. PI-UFBD, P = 0.0502.

#

Subgroup comparisons: IBS vs. UFBD, P < 0.9534; IBS vs. PI-IBS, P = 0.0303; PI-IBS vs. PI-UFBD, P = 0.6734.