Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 28.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000 Aug;112(4):575. doi: 10.1002/1096-8644(200008)112:4<575::AID-AJPA10>3.0.CO;2-0

TABLE 1. Subjects and strain gage placements1.

Pig no. Weight
(kg)
Age
(days)
Bone (Rosette gage) Suture (Single element gage)


Frontal Parietal Coronal Interfrontal Interparietal
147 22.6 115 R
154 20.0 96 R, L
155 18.1 98 R, L P2
156 17.2 102 R, L A2
157 21.8 131 L L
158 15.0 133 L L
159 15.0 100 R, L P
160 16.8 102 R, L P
161 17.2 114 R, L
162 27.7 125 L P, MP, M P, A
163 15.4 102 L MP A
164 16.8 99 L L P A
165 31.8 136 L MP, M P2
166 14.1 84 P A
167 31.8 161 R P, MP, M P, A
183 10.4 75 R P, A
184 12.7 75 L P, A
N = 17 9 (8) 6 (4) 11 (8) 13 (8) 11 (7)
Avg. 19.1 ± 6.2 109 ± 23
1

Midline gages were placed in the posterior (P), middle-posterior (MP), middle (M) and/or anterior (A) sections of their respective sutures. Bone and coronal suture gages were placed on right (R) and/or left (L). Totals are given for total gage sites (number of subjects).

2

The interparietal sutures of pigs 155, 156 and 165 gave very low strains (less than 10 με) under all conditions. Examination of the dried skulls revealed synostosis in 155 and 165. Although the suture appeared patent in 156 (a sibling of 155), we assume that some internal fusion had occurred and was the cause of the low strains. Data from these gages were not used in the calculations.