TABLE 4. Midline sutural strains during mastication (peak strains) and muscle stimulations1.
Masseter stimulation | Temporalis stimulation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mastication | Unilateral | Bilateral | Unilateral | Bilateral | |
Interfrontal | |||||
Posterior | −80 ± 192 (6) | −197 ± 152 (5) | −110 ± 146 (5) | −58 ± 118 (2) | −6 ± 67 (2) |
Mid-post | 182 ± 26 (4) | 488 ± 459 (4) | 1,290 ± 932 (4) | −143 ± 43 (3) | −170 ± 59 (3) |
Middle | 729 ± 221 (2) | 859 ± 62 (3) | 2,226 ± 277 (3) | −266 ±119 (3) | −327 ± 95 (3) |
Interparietal | |||||
Posterior | 594 ± 314 (4) | −100 ± 71 (2) | −221 ± 517 (4) | 422 ± 314 (2) | 575 ± 274 (4) |
438 ± 8 (3)2 | −150 (1)2 | −463 ± 224 (3)2 | 200 (1)2 | 449 ±129 (3)2 | |
Anterior | 221 ± 198 (7) | −90 ± 115 (5) | −73 ± 290 (7) | 101 ± 190 (4) | −23 ± 321 (4) |
150 ± 68 (6)2 | −127 ± 94 (4)2 | −156 ± 208 (6)2 | 14 ± 91 (3)2 | −182 ± 60 (3)2 |
Mean με ± standard deviation (number of gages). There were no significant differences between right and left chewing cycles or between right and left side stimulations; thus the sides were averaged.
Pig 167 had very high and sometimes paradoxical peak interparietal strains, inflating both the average and standard deviation. These values are calculated without pig 167.