Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 28.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000 Aug;112(4):575. doi: 10.1002/1096-8644(200008)112:4<575::AID-AJPA10>3.0.CO;2-0

TABLE 4. Midline sutural strains during mastication (peak strains) and muscle stimulations1.

Masseter stimulation Temporalis stimulation


Mastication Unilateral Bilateral Unilateral Bilateral
Interfrontal
 Posterior −80 ± 192 (6) −197 ± 152 (5) −110 ± 146 (5) −58 ± 118 (2) −6 ± 67 (2)
 Mid-post 182 ± 26 (4) 488 ± 459 (4) 1,290 ± 932 (4) −143 ± 43 (3) −170 ± 59 (3)
 Middle 729 ± 221 (2) 859 ± 62 (3) 2,226 ± 277 (3) −266 ±119 (3) −327 ± 95 (3)
Interparietal
 Posterior 594 ± 314 (4) −100 ± 71 (2) −221 ± 517 (4) 422 ± 314 (2) 575 ± 274 (4)
438 ± 8 (3)2 −150 (1)2 −463 ± 224 (3)2 200 (1)2 449 ±129 (3)2
 Anterior 221 ± 198 (7) −90 ± 115 (5) −73 ± 290 (7) 101 ± 190 (4) −23 ± 321 (4)
150 ± 68 (6)2 −127 ± 94 (4)2 −156 ± 208 (6)2 14 ± 91 (3)2 −182 ± 60 (3)2
1

Mean με ± standard deviation (number of gages). There were no significant differences between right and left chewing cycles or between right and left side stimulations; thus the sides were averaged.

2

Pig 167 had very high and sometimes paradoxical peak interparietal strains, inflating both the average and standard deviation. These values are calculated without pig 167.